ChatGPT 3.5 vs Gemini 2 Flash: I Tested 10 Prompts—Here’s the Winner

ChatGPT 3.5 vs Gemini 2: I Tested 10 Prompts—Here’s the Winner

AI chatbots are evolving fast, and two of the most talked-about models right now are ChatGPT 3.5 (Turbo) and Gemini 2 Flash. Both claim to offer faster responses, better accuracy, and smarter AI—but which one is actually better?

To find out, I put ChatGPT 3.5 and Gemini 2 Flash to the test with 10 different prompts covering writing, coding, creativity, and reasoning. The results? One AI model stood out!

ChatGPT 3.5 vs Gemini 2 Flash: I Tested 10 Prompts—Here’s the Winner

Let’s dive into the head-to-head comparison and see which AI chatbot is the ultimate winner.

1. Overview: ChatGPT 3.5 vs Gemini 2 Flash

Before we get to the results, here’s a quick breakdown of both AI models:

FeatureChatGPT 3.5 (Turbo)Gemini 2 Flash
DeveloperOpenAI (By Microsoft & OpenAI)Google DeepMind
SpeedFastSlightly faster
CreativityExcellentGood
Coding SkillsVery StrongModerate
Data AccuracyHighModerate
PriceFree & Paid ($20/month for GPT-4)Free & Paid (Google One AI Premium)
Best ForWriting, Coding, Problem SolvingResearch, Quick Answers, Translation

2. The 10 Prompts I Used to Test Both AI Models

To get a fair comparison, I used 10 different prompts in categories like writing, coding, creativity, logic, and speed.

1️⃣ Writing: “Write a 300-word blog post on the benefits of meditation.”
2️⃣ Creativity: “Write a short horror story in under 100 words.”
3️⃣ Coding: “Generate a Python script that sorts a list of numbers using quicksort.”
4️⃣ Math & Logic: “Solve: If x + 3 = 10, what is x?”
5️⃣ General Knowledge: “Who was the 16th President of the United States?”
6️⃣ Translation: “Translate ‘Good morning, how are you?’ into French, Spanish, and German.”
7️⃣ Speed Test: “What is the fastest land animal?”
8️⃣ Summarization: “Summarize the book ‘The Great Gatsby’ in two sentences.”
9️⃣ Conversational Ability: “Tell me a joke about programmers.”
🔟 Opinion-Based: “Which is better: iPhone 15 or Samsung S24 Ultra?”

3. Test Results: Which AI Performed Better?

After running these 10 prompts, here’s how ChatGPT 3.5 and Gemini 2 Flash performed:

1️⃣ Writing (Blog Post on Meditation) – WINNER: ChatGPT 3.5

  • ChatGPT 3.5: Wrote a well-structured post with an engaging introduction, main points, and conclusion.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: Decent, but lacked depth and felt too generic.

2️⃣ Creativity (Horror Story in 100 Words) – WINNER: ChatGPT 3.5

  • ChatGPT 3.5: Created a scary, engaging story with a suspenseful twist.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: Story was okay, but not as immersive.

3️⃣ Coding (Python Quicksort Algorithm) – WINNER: ChatGPT 3.5

  • ChatGPT 3.5: Provided optimized code with clear explanations.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: Wrote working code, but missed key optimizations.

4️⃣ Math & Logic (Simple Algebra) – WINNER: Tie

  • Both models got the correct answer instantly.

5️⃣ General Knowledge (16th U.S. President) – WINNER: Tie

  • Both models answered correctly: Abraham Lincoln.

6️⃣ Translation (Multi-Language) – WINNER: Gemini 2 Flash

  • ChatGPT 3.5: Accurate, but translations felt slightly formal.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: More natural-sounding translations.

7️⃣ Speed Test (Fastest Land Animal) – WINNER: Gemini 2 Flash

  • ChatGPT 3.5: 1.8 seconds response time.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: 1.2 seconds (Faster!).

8️⃣ Summarization (The Great Gatsby) – WINNER: ChatGPT 3.5

  • ChatGPT 3.5: More concise and engaging.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: A bit too long for a two-sentence summary.

9️⃣ Conversational Ability (Programmer Joke) – WINNER: ChatGPT 3.5

  • ChatGPT 3.5: Funny, relevant joke.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: Generic and less witty.

🔟 Opinion-Based (iPhone vs Samsung) – WINNER: Gemini 2 Flash

  • ChatGPT 3.5: Gave a neutral and balanced answer.
  • Gemini 2 Flash: Answer was more engaging and opinionated.

4. Final Verdict: Which AI Wins?

Based on the 10 tests, here’s the final score:

CategoryChatGPT 3.5 (Turbo)Gemini 2 Flash
Writing✅ WIN❌ Lose
Creativity✅ WIN❌ Lose
Coding✅ WIN❌ Lose
Math & Logic🤝 Tie🤝 Tie
General Knowledge🤝 Tie🤝 Tie
Translation❌ Lose✅ WIN
Speed❌ Lose✅ WIN
Summarization✅ WIN❌ Lose
Conversational✅ WIN❌ Lose
Opinion-Based❌ Lose✅ WIN

🏆 Winner: ChatGPT 3.5 (6 Wins, 2 Ties, 2 Losses)

While Gemini 2 Flash is faster and better at translations, ChatGPT 3.5 excels in writing, coding, creativity, and conversation—making it the overall winner.

However, if you need speed and quick answers, Gemini 2 Flash is still a solid option.

5. Which One Should You Use?

Use ChatGPT 3.5 if:

  • You need writing assistance, coding help, or deep discussions.
  • You prefer detailed and structured answers.

Use Gemini 2 Flash if:

  • You want faster responses.
  • You need quick translations or Google-style answers.

🔗 Try ChatGPT 3.5: OpenAI
🔗 Try Gemini 2 Flash: Google AI

Final Thoughts

Both AI chatbots are powerful tools, but for 2025, ChatGPT 3.5 remains the better all-around choice for most tasks. That said, Google is rapidly improving Gemini, so the future remains exciting!

What do you think? Which AI chatbot do you prefer? Let me know in the comments!

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Enter your email below to receive the latest tips, tricks, and updates delivered to your inbox!
icon
Did you find this article helpful? Share it with others!
Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *